Intelligent ecosystems and the intelligence of things


145073602I've long been fascinated by both science and the natural world around us, inspired by the amazing Sir David Attenborough with his ever-engaging documentaries and boundless enthusiasm for nature, and also by the late, great Carl Sagan and his ground-breaking documentary series, COSMOS. The relationships between the creatures, plants and ecology of our planet is an incredible story of symbiotic systems evolving, failing, adapting and improving, for more than 4 billion years on our own planet (which you could argue is itself just a tiny part of the longest running, deepest learning algorithm of all).

So at the dawn of this new age of autonomous connected devices and AI-enhanced software, it’s worth looking at natural systems to see if we can draw any lessons about the evolution of technology.

Symbiosis in nature

Symbiosis comes from the Greek, meaning ‘living together.’ But its meaning in biology goes far beyond that. Most symbiotic relationships have mutual benefit. The bacteria in our gut, for example, gain a place to live and we gain a powerful community of supporters who help regulate our digestive system.

These symbiotic systems have evolved over thousands of years because they provide advantages. The two parts combined are stronger than they are alone. And once a symbiotic relationship is established, the species involved will often evolve side-by-side. Cross-species collaboration provides some of the strongest lessons for the internet of things (IoT).

While science fiction abounds with examples of robots that have run wild and threatened humans, in reality robots need us. Computer chess challenges have demonstrated that a computer can beat a grand master. But more recently they've also shown that amateur chess players can beat a grand master if they have a bit of computing help and a good process backing them up. A TED talk from a few years ago suggested that the process was key.

Dare I suggest then that it might be the same with the IoT? You can bring together all the sensors in the world and generate an enormous amount of data, but that will do you no good if you don’t also have good processes to interrogate the data and produce insights. And even that does little good if these insights cannot then feed back into the system to produce changes -- evolution, if you like.

A review of evolution

We once thought evolution was an all or nothing event. Species rose and fell, depending on their natural advantages. Take humans, for example. Homo sapiens were thought to have out-competed the Neanderthals, or possibly wiped them out. But more recent DNA evidence suggests that the two species co-existed and inter-bred for many hundreds of years.

Around 2 per cent of the DNA of all modern humans not originating in Africa can be traced back to Neanderthals, but it’s not the same 2 per cent in each person. There are estimates that around 50 per cent of Neanderthal DNA may have survived in modern humans (thanks to one of my favourite presenters, Professor Alice Roberts, for that info).

That’s pretty good for a species that was supposedly wiped out thousands of years ago. In other words, Neanderthals were not an evolutionary dead-end, but simply a part of an evolving and ongoing pattern that has left its mark on the world.

Learning from nature

I think this merging process is likely to be the way of hardware and software too.

Open source is the current big thing. Everyone wants to be seen to be using open source to prove they don’t need proprietary specialised systems. Why would I buy your wheel, when I can make my own, better wheel, tailored to my specific needs?

Except, of course, that developing my own, unique system (or wheel) risks breaking the rules of evolution. Get too specialised, and you can’t adapt as easily to change. That’s why species sometimes become extinct. Evolution doesn’t stop, but species can, and do.

I suggest that a more nuanced process is taking place. We're changing systems to fit our needs. But each new generation takes the best of the previous one, and adds to that learning from elsewhere. The latest generation of robots is taking lessons from octopus limbs to become more flexible and adaptable, but simpler.

Perhaps the key lesson is that nature is not predictable. It's hard to see how some symbioses ever emerged, or how particular animals or plants evolved. But it's certain that they took advantage of an opportunity that nothing else saw. Some of the opportunities from the IoT may be equally difficult to see. But only those who see them are likely to survive in the longer term.

To take a look at IoT opportunities in specific industries, download the TDWI e-book: Four use cases show the real-world impact of the IoT.


About Author

Peter Pugh-Jones

Head of Operations, EMEA & APAC, Global IoT Division, SAS

Peter Pugh-Jones leads a team of expert industry consultants across EMEA & APAC for the global IoT division at SAS. During a career spanning four decades, he has been lucky enough to have worked all over the world in diverse roles and sectors of the technology and software industries. A passionate believer of utilising the right tools and technology to meet the data and analytical challenges of the present day, Pete or PPJ considers himself a lifelong learner with an optimistic view of the future of technology and the adoption of artificial intelligence to improve quality of life and sustainability. Pete is driven by a sense of responsibility to ensure his customers derive the very best return on their investments in digital transformation technologies. With the convergence of robotics, analytics, artificial intelligence and IoT on the cusp of this fourth industrial revolution, Pete firmly believes there has never been a more exciting or important time to be working in the advanced analytics space as we begin the journey to operationalise AI and transform all our lives for the better.

Comments are closed.

Back to Top