Will we trust AI enough to realise its full potential?


Will we trust AI ?Did you know that whether you own a car, and the colour of your car, can give some very interesting insights into whether you will pay your taxes?

This may sound unlikely, but recent work with a European national tax office using some highly detailed data found some fascinating connections. The first insight is that car ownership is a very good indicator of whether you are likely to miss a tax payment – but the relationship depends on age. For those over 30, not owning a car is linked to missing payments, but for those under 30, the opposite is true: Better payers are less likely to own a car. What’s more, those who own a red or black car are more likely to default or miss payments.

You can see that the age issue might be fairly logical from a lifestyle point of view, even if the colour is harder to explain. We could speculate that those over 30 generally tend to earn more, so are more likely to be able to afford a car. Those under 30 might be stretching to afford one, and therefore potentially struggling financially. Whatever the reasons, this is all very interesting if you are sitting in the tax office, wondering which people to “nudge” about their taxes and how to target the public sector equivalent of customer engagement. Asking the right question is the start of a more productive analytics journey.

Asking better questions

Analytics in general, and AI in particular, can help us to understand both what customers want and their response to engagement efforts. It is obvious that if you do not put out the right information, then you will not get the right response, and this follows for public sector organisations too. Consider Toyota’s “brake-gate”: The company’s communications focused heavily on damage limitation, but text mining work showed that people really wanted to know how to fix the problem. This produced a mismatch in expectations, which was unlikely to lead to happy customers doing what was wanted by the company. So for taxes, what makes people pay on time? Threats, or gentle reminders? You have to understand the customer response before you communicate.

Real-time analytics is often considered the preserve of retail, but it also has potential in the public sector. Consider immigration and customs. Analytics could be used to identify which of those passing the Border Control desk should be stopped for a conversation, and also which goods to inspect in a three-hour transfer window. This will improve targeting of resources at potential problems, which is likely to be helpful to both customers and customs officers.

Trust and responsibility: The ethical dimension

There is, of course, another side to this, and that is related to trust. Particularly in the public sector, funded by taxpayers, your customers need to trust the results of your analytics, and especially the effects on their lives. In the 1990s and 2000s, the Metropolitan Police in the UK used statistics to justify stopping and searching a disproportionate number of young black men, on the grounds that they were more likely to be involved in knife (and other) crime. Trust in the Met dropped hugely when this became public knowledge, particularly in London, and there was a big community backlash. It may have been justifiable in terms of the statistics, but not in terms of the outcome.

Public sector organisations planning to use analytics need to remember that the end does not justify the means, and the means must be clear and transparent.

Many organisations need to share data with partners to maximise the effect of analytics. Sharing personal data without permission is not permitted under GDPR, but it may be worth considering the potential to share insights. It is, after all, reasonable to assume that those who default on their tax payments may also default on other types of payment too.

Will this sharing, however, be acceptable to customers? This is a conversation that needs to be expanded. Public sector organisations have a responsibility to protect and safeguard public money by reducing fraud and nonpayment, but they also need to be trusted to do that in an ethical way. The debate about how to achieve these aims is by no means over, but it is clear that analytics has an important part to play in the process. And with machine learning already being rolled out, the broader implications of how algorithms learn and the impact of AI will dictate more consumer education.


About Author

Mads Krogh

Business Advisor

Datamining and explorative analytics thought leader. Targeting the dramatic change in the use of data to explore, detect and prevent fraud, non-compliance and waste in transaction driven organizations as we know it today. Firmly believe that this is one domain where analytics really can do a significant difference. I find it rewarding to support the anti-fraud community’s knowledge through my white papers and blogs, conference speaking engagements and participating in public debates.

Leave A Reply

Back to Top