Forecasting or Golf?

1

A recurring theme of The Business Forecasting Deal (both this blog and the book) is that forecasting is a huge waste of management time. This doesn't mean that forecasting is pointless, irrelevant, or entirely useless in running our organizations. It only means that the amount of time, money, and human effort spent on forecasting is not commensurate with the amount of benefit achieved. We tend to spend way too many resources on forecasting while failing to achieve the desired (or necessary!) level of accuracy.

Working on a problem (like bad forecasting) doesn't necessarily make it any better. Process participants often make the forecasting worse, so how do we go about "excusing" them from process?

If you suspect a particular individual or group is contaminating the forecasting process and making the forecast worse, your first step is to gather the data and conduct forecast value added (FVA) analysis to confirm that this is true. That may be the easy part! The next step is to convince those in power within your organization that the process needs to be changed.

Suppose you find that inputs from field sales is just making the forecast worse. You probably won’t get any complaints from the sales reps themselves if you tell them they no longer have to forecast. Few people want to provide forecasts, or be held accountable for their numbers.

You might be able to suggest a better use of their time – perhaps asking that the sales force communicate when there are significant things impacting customer demand. But there is no need to for them to communicate all the little ups and downs that tend to cancel each other out. Rather than spend non-value adding time on forecasting, might it be better use of sales rep time to play golf with customers -- building relationships and making sales! (And why not play golf with the forecasters, too, to build those relationships?)

Nobody is likely to change anything without solid data and analysis. But upper management should be willing to accept facts, and ultimately, it is in their interest to get better forecasts. It is also in everyone’s interest to have the sales force out making more sales, rather than spending time making the forecast worse.

If the individual or group causing the problem is in executive management, this may be more of a challenge, and will be discussed next time.

Tags
Share

About Author

Mike Gilliland

Product Marketing Manager

Michael Gilliland is a longtime business forecasting practitioner and formerly a Product Marketing Manager for SAS Forecasting. He is on the Board of Directors of the International Institute of Forecasters, and is Associate Editor of their practitioner journal Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting. Mike is author of The Business Forecasting Deal (Wiley, 2010) and former editor of the free e-book Forecasting with SAS: Special Collection (SAS Press, 2020). He is principal editor of Business Forecasting: Practical Problems and Solutions (Wiley, 2015) and Business Forecasting: The Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (Wiley, 2021). In 2017 Mike received the Institute of Business Forecasting's Lifetime Achievement Award. In 2021 his paper "FVA: A Reality Check on Forecasting Practices" was inducted into the Foresight Hall of Fame. Mike initiated The Business Forecasting Deal blog in 2009 to help expose the seamy underbelly of forecasting practice, and to provide practical solutions to its most vexing problems.

Back to Top