Want to be leading edge? Lead your edge.

2

So many companies today describe themselves as "leading edge," or they strive to achieve excellence or market leadership. And we all have our own ideas of companies that are leading edge, as well as the companies that may once have been market leaders and for any number of reasons have lost their edge. From time to time, I think about the idea of being leading edge and what it takes to get there and stay there, and inevitably it leads back to the question of people.

Organizations are the sum of its parts, which can be distilled all the way down to the individual person. And so the idea of "leading edge" or excellence is best achieved when all the individuals in the organization have the same vision of excellence and can be led to work together toward that shared ideal. But rarely is it smooth sailing.

My most recent chance to contemplate the idea (and challenges to reaching it) came yesterday as I read the print edition of the  Sunday newspaper while drinking my beloved café con leche. I came across a regular column I enjoy called "The View from HR" by Bruce Clarke. Bruce is the President and CEO of CAI, Inc., a Human Resources Management Firm and yesterday's column is titled,  Employees, managers should view problems as opportunities. What struck a chord with me was how he used the example of an airport scenario that I had personally experienced at the exact same airport & gate the last time I went on a business trip, which he described in this way:

-----

Boarding gates for commuter flights at Washington's National Airport can be tricky.
Washington's National Airport Gate 35A - Door 2 channels "Lets Make a Deal" minus the fun, the prizes or Monty Hall.

"...people standing, children complaining to parents, poor signage and unclear processes. Employees behind the counter shouted unintelligibly over loudspeakers, much like a poor quality drive-thru at a burger place. Their tone and body language screamed: I hate this, you hate this, listen up, and shut up!

At one point, an employee entered the mosh pit to loudly tell a family they could not stand there and would have to move. Another shouted, “Don’t go down there until your flight is called!” Observers exchanged glances of amazement and wonder. It was a parallel universe of sorts.

I asked an airline employee standing near me – who also was waiting for a flight – if this scene could get any funnier or sadder. He said the only thing sadder was that the airline employees earn about the same salaries they were making 10 years ago."

-----

After I realized how uncannily similar my experience was at the same airport gate, I recalled how both Brian Solis and Scott Stratten have separately shared similar ideas to what Bruce Clarke alludes to in his excellent column - it's all about the customer experience and the way you equip/train/motivate/coach your employees that deal directly with the customer impacts the kind of experience your customer is going to have.

As I thought about those airline gate agents and other employees, I doubted that any of them started their work day intending to be grumpy or unpleasant. And bad customer service is just never associated with "leading edge" no matter how you define it. But does anybody bring malintent to any job? Fortunately, I doubt it's ever intentional, but when it happens (and it does), why does it happen?  In his column, Bruce went on to ask some important questions:

  • Where was management?
  • Where was the customer-focused employee?
  • What was the bystander employee thinking?

And the marketing issue for all companies is increasingly that customers are now talking with megaphones and if you're giving your customers bad experiences, you can be sure they are sharing their stories. Does that affect their propensity to choose you over a competitor? You know the answer - and so much for all your positioning statements and branding efforts.

Lest it seem like I am going off on an airline-bashing tirade, I know that airline employee contracts are often governed by collective bargaining and that National Airport was built in the 1940s, so it may not accommodate today's ideal for air travel. Gate 35A is a far-from-ideal situation for many reasons. Bruce ends his column with a thought-provoking statement:
-----

So the real question becomes: Are we victims or are we human beings with purpose? As an employee or a manager, you can help create the kind of workplace where problems can be seen as opportunities to make a difference.

-----
I like his thought, but I have a different take on that situation and what it means for marketing leaders today. Every company has the equivalent of a Gate 35A - perhaps many of them.  So think about the behaviors you want your employees to exhibit and how it might impact the customer experience, and ask yourself three questions:
.
  1. Do your people have the training and experience they need to perform their job at hand?
    While this question is considered basic management, it's not a question that should be taken for granted. When problems do arise (and they will), this is one question to consider.
    .
  2. Are your incentives driving the behaviors you want?
    Most functions within the marketing deparment have changed dramatically in the last few years - so when's the last time you took a good, hard look at the objectives you've set for the positions on your team? Do those objectives align with an updated view of "leading edge."
    .
  3. Have you defined excellence for your teams?
    Job descriptions define requirements and performance objectives reflect those definitions - so have you also defined excellence for each objective? In other words, with the same specificity that you lay out requirements to meet objectives, do you give details on what it means to exceed the objectives? For example, on a five-point scale where three is "good" because you're meeting your position requirements, have you defined what it takes to earn a four or a five? i.e. Have you defined your "edge?"

It really comes down to deciding what kind of marketing you want. If you want to be considered leading edge, then lead your edge. Anything else is leading your average - and that's probably what you'll get. Or something lesser.

Thoughts?

Share

About Author

John Balla

Principal Marketing Strategist

Hi, I'm John Balla - I co-founded the SAS Customer Intelligence blog and served as Editor for five years. I held a number of marketing roles at SAS as Content Strategist, Industry Field Marketing and as Go-to-Marketing Lead for our Customer Intelligence Solutions. I like to find and share content and experiences that open doors, answer questions, and sometimes challenge assumptions so better questions can be asked. Outside of work I am an avid downhill snow skier, hiker and beach enthusiast. I stay busy with my family, volunteering for civic causes, keeping my garden green, striving for green living, expressing myself with puns, and making my own café con leche every morning. I’ve lived and worked on 3 contents and can communicate fluently in Spanish, Portuguese, Hungarian and get by with passable English. Prior to SAS, my experience in marketing ranges from Fortune 100 companies to co-founding two start ups. I studied economics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and got an MBA from Georgetown. Follow me on Twitter. Connect with me on LinkedIn.

2 Comments

  1. Thanks John for reading my column and adding these excellent ideas that took it beyond where I left off. I wonder if part of the problem is even one more layer up: has top management agreed on performance and service expectations? Or, are they simply in operational survival mode working every day to get through that day?

    • John Balla

      Hi Bruce!
      And thank you for an interesting follow-up question. I think it really depends on the organization - and in many cases, they may very well be in operational survival mode as you put it and that's how we end up in situations like Gate 35A. In most cases, I'd say the problem is most certainly one or even more layers up because I do think it IS a matter of service expectations. But I also think it's a matter of culture and how upper management may (or may not) be demonstrating or encouraging customer-centric behaviors, and/or whether or not individual contributors have the leeway to lead in the absence of clear direction from above. In the airline industry, Southwest distinguishes itself for having a consistently customer-centric culture and one that appears to encourage individual contributors to take charge, especially if it's for or on behalf of a customer. I've seen it in action many times to know that those attitudes are ingrained in the culture.

Leave A Reply

Back to Top