Tuesday, March 3. 2009Is Performance Management Art, Craft or Science?Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Gary,
Excellent examples of "how to" measurements as applied to different operations within a business. Since you wrote about the examples, do you find that people often have a difficult time trying to figure out how to measure results as an important part of business intelligence? I do. I wonder if you were writing examples, because most people need examples - e.g. it doesn't intuitively come to them? Rodney Brim http://www.managepro.com/blog Rodney,
Your points are good ones. I do try to use examples and also analogies. I often describe the full Performance Management framework as an automobile with poorly meshed engine gears, a GPS, poor fuel efficiency, etc. Regarding the selection of measures, for KPIs in a scorecard (in contrast to just PIs (performance indicators, but not key ones) in a dashboard, those should be derived from a strategy map as a diciplined exercise. Examples may lead an organization to measure what they can measure, not what they should measure to acheive strategic objectives. Gary Hi Gary,
I didn't say my question clear enough. Let me write it differently. I am wondering if you, like I, find that people often have a very difficult time developing a performance metric based upon their initiative or goal? I find that our customers often confuse basing a metric upon an activity, versus an outcome. Ex. they may want to create a better process, but base their metrics on whether or not people attended a course, or general group ratings on the success of the improvement process, instead of determining what the outcome would look like if they made the improvement and then figuring out a way to measure to that. Rodney Rodney,
I agree with your points that I interpret as it is better to have output and result outcome types of measures than only the "influencing" activity measures. (We could confuse the semantics by calling these "leading [activity]" and "lagging [outcome] measures.) My belief is it is best to have both types. On which type the greater emphasis should be would depend on other factors. If you felt confident the "activity" measures strongly and consistently" created the "outcome" measures (dare I say "high correlation"?), then the activity measures could be reliable. What is the correct balance? Well, that is why it's called a "balanced scorecard" ... there are several aspects of what's being balanced. Gary |
ABOUT GARY
Gary Cokins, CPIM is Global Product Marketing Manager for Performance Management at SAS, the world’s leader in business intelligence, and analytical software. He is an internationally recognized expert, speaker, and author. Read more.
BOOKS, ARTICLES & MORE
This look at current performance management trends isn’t a dry recipe or "how-to." It examines multiple methodologies and behavioral change management to overcome the natural resistance to change.
Read more.
The blog content appearing on this site does not necessarily represent the opinions of SAS. Your use of this blog is governed by the Terms of Use.
QuicksearchShow tagged entriesaberdeen accountability activity-based activity-based costing africa alignment analyst analytics analytics statistics april fool art Ashit athena b-eye-network balanced scorecard banking behavior change book authors Buckminster Fuller business analytics business intelligence buytendijk chief performance officer cnn coliseum correlation cosmonaut cpo CRM culture customer focus customer value darwin downturn employee empowerment enterprise performance optimization examples executive Express Computer framework full vision futuristic performance management government hungary institutionalization italy kpis leadership legacy management managers march madness model newton obama optimism optimization orchestra organizational transformation paladino. government Panjwani performance performance management predictions predictive performance management privacy private equity firms profitability racehorse rick sherman risk Russia schiff SEB sports strategy execution Sweden Taylor teamwork text analytics text mining turkey twitter yuri
|