In my opinion this should be published in a peer-reviewed journal ! Even though there are caveats / limitations / possible differences between the sciences - there doesn't seem much point in calculating a rank-based correlation coefficient if you've no idea whether it is "weak," "moderate," or "strong" !! (unless you are strictly going to restrict interpretation to comparisons with other values; which is less likely if you've only calculated one value). The differences shown between Kendall and Pearson interpretations are quite marked. I look forward to reading the paper.