Hi Rick,

I frequently get the message at the bottom on the lines table stating "The LINES display does not reflect all significant comparisons. The following additional pairs are significantly different:" even with a balanced design experiment, when I analyze count data in Glimmix with the negative binomial distribution. Furthermore, the "additional pairs are significantly different" part usually makes no sense. If I manually log transform the data first and then run it as a normal distribution, the lines problem usually goes away. Is there something specific to Glimmix where it has issues generating lsmeans when the data have been log transformed (link=log) to be analyzed as a negative binomial distribution?

Thanks for your thoughts on this!