The results on Iris and 28 other important well known applications were published in a survey article and the name of the routine was indicated in that paper obviously as 'Products'. the results reprted was 0.9949 of 150 correctly classified or 1 flower misclassified, which is well known as Fisher/Anderson classified one flower incorrectly. By the way, the result and other like it consisted of 150 replications of a sample of 10% of the application selected by simple random sampling and no conditions were imposed, as it is precisely discussed in the paper. Results: average 0.9949 best 1.0000 worst 0.9933: often only 1 flower, the culprit, misclassified. I would be happy to discuss this data and results with you. Contact me, if you like at Giacomo.Patrizi@uniroma1.it. Yours Giacomo Patrizi